Religious Believers Understand More Essay

To discuss this asseveration first we must look at the definition of understanding. ghostlike worshippers and scientists would belike disaccord in their definitions and therefore disagree from the beginning. A religious person would perhaps arrange that understanding the origination means erudite how to be a good person, how to stand a good life and meet Gods plan. A scientist would probably disagree, saying that understanding the conception is having a wide knowledge and good science of how the world works including theories like phylogeny and understanding why and how things occur. A nonher slim problem with this statement is its implication that champion cannot be a religious believer and a scientist when in fact there ar many a(prenominal) religious scientists who bet to have science and religion active harmoniously in their populates. If we are be understanding as understanding how to live a good life, then I believe that the Bible and spectral Believers do understand more about the world than Scientists do.Religious Believers have a die understanding of how the universe and mans place in it was set up, but its knockout for people to understand correctly because its not in scientific terms, its in myths and metaphors. You cant see it with our available scientific instruments, its something you experience. Religious Believers have direct guidance from their blessed texts, e.g. for the Jewish faith, the Torah on how to live their life. They are taught, by the Ten Commandments, that they are not to steal, not to commit adultery and not to murder.One criticism of scientists is that a tally of assumption are made to submit parameters to an experiment. Also perception can be fallible, as we tarry to see things, so we see them. We dont expect to see them, so we miss them out. In response to this, in the parable the hidden nurseryman where the religious believer trusts that the nurseryman came but couldnt be seen and the early(a) (scientist) believing that there couldnt be a gardener because there was no empirical evidence of this. This shows that even though there was no evidence of the gardener or God they still cargo hold a belief, whereas the scientist had to be proven. Some occupy that believers only want commit.Religious Believers hope for the return of their invisible gardener, epoch New Atheists (Richard Dawkins and his followers) have no expectations of a new life after death, thereforelive their lives without upkeep of an almighty God smiting them down. In this situation, unrivaled could argue that the Religious Believer is playing it safe, however they still understand the world better, in many cases they see it as an almighty beings creation.In conclusion, I believe that, although Scientists have make of the age of the earth, and that they have proven many facts of the Earth, They do not have as good guidance as Religious Believers do on understanding life.