Final Paper Reilgion Freud And Lewis

On the other hand Freud the return of psychoanalysis and an atheist could only produce the kind of dearest that was reciprocal. I believe that they were tied to their views on religion by their understanding of what love was to them. Lewis once believed or at least had to some stop thought like Freud. As I relate pietism Why Bother I couldnt supporter but think about The watch out stead holiness Is Dangerous stated morality Is both psychologically and sociologically dangerous. Freud and Lexiss perspectives on love differ because Lewis focuses on God while Freud focuses on self. One on hand. Lexiss explains that Gods love in man enables him to love unconditionally. For an example, Lewis believed the divine gift love in a man enables him to love what is not durably lovable lepers, criminals, enemies and morons. On the other hand, Freud believes on the gratification of self because a mans beliefs and behavior stem from his own childhood fears and desires.Moreover, Freud and Lewis perspectives on love are tied in concert because they focus on the affection for family, friends and sexual love however, Lewis added a fourth category love of God. Lexiss answer to Frauds critique on religion is that love does not have an ulterior motive. In my opinion, the viewpoints within Religion Why Bother are self- centered rather than leafless because there has to more than Frauds type of love therefore, most circumstances do not revolve around oneself.Because God Is love. Lexiss perspective on love is more convincing than Frauds for the reason that Lewis acknowledged that to believe in God and to pray, were the beginning of his extroversion. The light came on, He had been taken out of himself. BY BFY5050 degree thought like Freud. As I relate Religion Why Bother I couldnt help but think about The Watch Out Attitude Religion Is Dangerous stated Religion is both differ because Lewis focuses on God while Freud focuses on self. One on hand,